The attempt of the European Equestrian Federation (EEF) to reintroduce the collective marks on dressage score sheets has received a hard no from the FEI. The rule change will not be put up for a vote at the upcoming FEI General Assembly in Antwerp on 14 - 17 November 2021.
Removal of Three Collective Marks in 2018
In 2018, the FEI removed the collective marks for paces, impulsion and submission on the grounds that Judges could misuse these marks to manipulate the result. Only the mark for the “Athlete’s position and seat; correctness and effect of the aids” was left with the coefficient 2
At the time the Dressage Judging Working Group provided statistical analyses of the collective marks in tests from 2017 and in particular from the 2017 World Cup Finals in Omaha. It generated hard evidence that top scoring, big name riders get an extra score boost from the judges in their collective marks. In some high level events the ranking of the technical marks was overruled by that of the collective marks.
The DJWG argued that the collective marks are already taken into account in the movement scores. The switch of emphasis from a movement mark - based on exactly what the judge sees at the moment of execution - to a collective note that is designed to summarize the entire test, does not aid the judge’s focus.
EEF Proposal to Re-introduce Two Collective Marks
This year, however, the European Equestrian Federation has made an effort this year to re-introduce the collective marks into a dressage score sheet, arguing that, "since there is a collective mark for the rider, it is the logical consequence to also give a collective mark for the horse or its training status. This would force the Judge to give an evaluation of the principles of Dressage riding at the end of each test."
The EEF proposed to delete the coefficient 2 and split up the collective mark into two, and this proposal received the full agreement of the British and American equestrian federation:
The EEF proposed idea was:
After the Athlete has finished his performance, collective marks are awarded for the implementation of General Principles and for Harmony of Presentation.
4.1 The implementation of General Principles comprises
- Freedom and regularity of the paces;
- Engagement of the hind quarters;
- Elasticity of the steps;
- Suppleness of the back;
- Straightness -
Acceptance of the bridle;
4.2 Harmony of Presentation comprises
- attention and confidence of the Horse
- harmony in the presentation of the rider/horse combination;
- rider’s position and seat;
- discreet and effective influence of the aids.
The Collective marks are awarded from zero (0) to ten (10). 5. The collective marks for General Principles and for Harmony of Presentation are not given a coefficient. Certain difficult movements, can be given a coefficient, which is fixed by the FEI.
DJWG and JAG Say No
The FEI does not support the proposal to split the collective marks again.
"In line with the findings on the Dressage Judging Working Group (DJWG), the one Collective mark will be maintained. The points listed are already assessed for each movement," read the final version of the 2021 FEI rule revision document. "Both the DJWG and the JAG strongly recommended to keep the Collective mark unchanged for 2022, as the DJWG had presented strong reasoning previously as to why only one Collective mark was to be used."
Therefore this rule change will not be up for a vote at the FEI General Assembly.
To make a decision the FEI consulted with the Judging Advisory Group (JAG) and the Dressage Judging Working Group. The DJWG consists of David Stickland, Richard Davison, Maribel Alonso, Bettina de Rham and Frank Kemperman. Founded in 2020, the JAG consists of Katrina Wüst, Stephen Clarke ,Hans-Christian Matthiesen, George Williams, and David Hunt (GBR).
Read the final version of rule revision 2021 document here.
FEI Dressage Committee Appoints Judging Advisory Group, To Integrate FEI Judge General Role
FEI General Assembly Approves DJWG's Proposal to Remove Collectives from Score Sheets
Dressage Judging Working Group Presents 19 Recommendations to Improve System